Spurs Banter Archive June 13 2011

 

Use our rumours form to send us spurs transfer rumours.

13 Jun 2011 22:18:15
I'm just not sure about spending that amount on money on a kid who hasn't played in the prem league and may not settle if he does. If we are looking to buy a quality young striker then sturridge would be my shout. Rufus.

Believable2 Unbelievable2

Sturridge is not a team player and is extremely lazy. This leandro guy is a big punt but he has all the attributes to become a top player for spurs. Look how well sandro has turned out. I would definately pursue this guys signature.
leandro and another proven goalscorer is what we need. i'd be happy with leandro and Lavezzi/Rossi/Falcao.

Azza

Agree2 Disagree2

Why do you spuds think you can attract big name strikers, you are playin on the europa league ffs, get real you are more likely to sign carlton cole

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Jun 2011 21:25:14
It's time for Harry to go, levy can't afford to be splashing out if Harry will go off to england in a year! Also, he may be a bit of a 'wheeler dealer' in the Market but players like Joe cole and Scott Parker are his typical signings, old and someone Harry feel he can personally train. Levy should take main charge over the transfers and get in someone like Moyes who can steer the ship for years to come. COYS

Believable0 Unbelievable2

13 Jun 2011 20:02:04
Yeh got to agree that was an excellent post from superyid.
I thought palacios was off to napoli.
I have also heard that levy is not happy to pay for s. parker since w ham want too much. This could explain the rodwell rumours emerging.

Spurs guvnor

Id take Rodwell over Parker anyday, the lad has huge potential AND he can play centre half. . .
Super Yid

Believable3 Unbelievable0

13 Jun 2011 18:13:00
Yeh got to agree that was an excellent post from superyid.
I thought palacios was off to napoli.
I have also heard that levy is not happy to pay for s. parker since w ham want too much. This could explain the rodwell rumours emerging.

Spurs guvnor

Believable3 Unbelievable2

I think that may be the problem, Harry wants the quick fix players cole/parker who may only be good for another season or2 whilst harry may still be at the club(the signing of freidel is a case point) where as levy has the long term future of the club in mind as i looking more towards young talent even if it is at a price, some one needs to tell harry to maintain an further our progress we should not be shopping in poundland.

Agree1 Disagree1

Levy doesn't want to sign a player that has no resale value. His last performance for England summed him up for me. Looked completely out of place performing on the big stage. Was outplayed, out run, chased shadows and made untimed, reckless challenges in dangerous areas. We do not need that at spurs.

Guv, Napoli mande a bid of 10 million which was rejected by us because we was holding out for 12, But now theres bigs rumours suggesting spurs want to offer cash plus palacios for Lavezzi. Either way Palacios will be sold.

Azza

Agree1 Disagree1

Palacios as part of a deal for levazzi would be an amazing move by Levy

Agree4 Disagree1

13 Jun 2011 17:58:54
I think the Palacios deal looks to be on, he would be a great player for the club. Not too sure about Bassong joining, i doubt Newcastle will want to let go of him.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

13 Jun 2011 17:46:00
I think that the Palacios deal looks to be a real possibility. . he would be a great player for the club.

Azza

Believable0 Unbelievable1

13 Jun 2011 17:45:54
Ok, bare with me on this one. I think you put too much play on Liverpools "history" in so much that the perception is the clubs past and tradition will automatically attract top class players. Im of an age that remembers the Shankly/Paisley eras and can appreciate the fact that the club does, indeed have a long, lustrious history littered with major successes. The problem with that is that im well into middle age so how relevent is that history to somebody younger? My 25 year old son has no real idea of liverpools past and nor would a young top class player. Its fair to say, considering the belief that Liverpool ( and i don't disagree) is a "Big" club, their successes over the last 20 years have been poor, havent they? It would also be fair to say that our performance over that same period has been even worse BUT not hugely so.To this end, in order to sell ourselves to a big time Charlie, we have to sell ourselves in such a way that makes us more attractive to players than other clubs. We will have to sell them our history, which we do have, our ambition which we do have and, in all probability, a wage structure will have to be broken to demonstrate our ambition to them. Liverpool will actually have to do the same! A Young Brazilian/European will not understand to the same degree as a british player, just how significant Liverpool is on the world stage. The simple fact is, both clubs will have their work cut out attracting top quality players. It certainly helps matters, in terms of who is actualy in charge too. I would guess that Dalgleish will be more of a draw than redknapp because he has been successful both on the pitch and as a manager. It was Henry Ford who said "History is bunk" and, to a degree he was right. History is only relevent if you remember it, take an interest in it or it has directly affected you or the life you live. There is a whole new generation of players out there who will see Liverpools history no differently to the history of, say the great Ajax team of the 70s. ive found myself having to show my kids clips of Cryuff and Maradona just to give them an insite into a history that i remember and to demonstrate to them that Messi isn't the first "great" and won't be the last.
To close, how do we sell ourselves to top draw players? With lots of hard work and lots of money. I would, respectfully suggest that, in the year 2011, Liverpool will have to go down that route too, the world of football has changed, there are different clubs sitting at the top of the pile and liverpool will have to work damn hard to claw its way back to the top of the table. the difference between you and us is that we last sat at that table in the 60s and yourselves far more recently. You have a large hill to climb, we have a mountain. Remember tho, Everest was conquered, nothing is impossible so long as you have the belief, desire, ambition and funding to get you to the top. Dont believe that Liverpool are that much closer to the peak than we are, you are not. both clubs have work to do but both CAN push on. For us, it will depend on who we can keep not who we bring in, for liverpool, its going to be down to money, how much will the new owners chance their arms with by throwing it in? Personally, id give King kenny what he needs, i rate him highly, he will make the difference for you big time. Harry? Im not convinced tbh, less so now than ever. Time will tell.

Excellent post whoever you are

Twas me, Super yid.
Keep the faith, people!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Who else could it be?

This guy is the only one bothered to post about the club. The rest of you guys should be ashamed of yourselves.

Plastic fans.

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Jun 2011 17:43:58
He knows they r not big. .no big players.

what will he do .
.an irritating. .smug comment no where . . the point
grow up man . .
no not man
grow up kid. .(men . at least accept the truth )

Think before you post. No big players? really?
Think again.
Super yid

Believable0 Unbelievable0

OHHHH im so sorryy. .

i forgot abt . pinnar, cole n teenager Jonathan Blondel


n the biggest (i mean by age) n oldest . the uncle friedel . . .wow really really big

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Jun 2011 17:26:32
Harry keeping targets close to his chest, cause man city get wind of anything they can blow us out of the water bidding.news is parker on way not very happy with this but maybe as squad player.we r sniffing around shawcross from stoke but not wanting to pay large, keane and jenas could be offered in this deal.harrys marquee signing will be benzema from madrid in 28 million deal.coys simon.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

13 Jun 2011 16:16:54
Re Jack Masters, no one likes a smart ass, espcially a scouse one.
You forgot to mention that liverpool got a few beatings off spurs last season, not bad for a team that can't attract top players.
Infact spurs have better players, no contest. Liverpool are desperate mugs, hence henderson and carroll.
I look forward to next season and to giving your trapped in the 1980s club yet another beating.
Get a job jack masters.

Spurs guvnor

Believable2 Unbelievable1

As always . .
typical spud . .
he knows they r not big. .no big players.

what will he do .
.an irritating. .smug comment no where . . the point
grow up man . .
no not man
grow up kid. .(men . at least accept the truth )

Agree2 Disagree0

13 Jun 2011 12:04:06
13 Jun 2011 08:07:11
Okay. Where do I start?
Right. Firstly, I don't purport to be eloquent and insightful and some bright spark.
Two, although I ended up insulting/mocking you lot, that wasn't the aim.
Winding you up or creating aggro was certainly last of my intentions.
Being a passionate footy fan, I guess I got carried away and couldn't resist having a pop at you.
Apologies.
We are all football fans, aren't we? And debate is part and parcel of the game.
When I asked you what your unique selling proposition was, I was being sincere.
I often hear you lot talk about Aguero, Hulk, Rossi, very good players indeed who'll have top, top clubs to pick from.
So I just wanted to find out from you what is it that you have which would make them choose you over those clubs.
Really, fellas, it's a genuine question. Forget what was said between us in previous posts and let's start on a clean slate.
I would really, really want to know what advantage you believe your club has over, let's say us and Arsenal.
There's a bloke who did say that what will you a chance at getting the cream of the crop is if the top and/or more prestigious clubs don't go after them.
Although that's not cast-iron a point, fair enough to the lad.
But I'm sure that's not the only card you think might swing it in your favour.
So come on, I wanna hear it.
No insults, no pops.
Just a civilised discussion between fans who are very passionate about clubs and expect great things for the future.
Let's get on with it.
Jack Masters

Ok, bare with me on this one. I think you put too much play on Liverpools "history" in so much that the perception is the clubs past and tradition will automatically attract top class players. Im of an age that remembers the Shankly/Paisley eras and can appreciate the fact that the club does, indeed have a long, lustrious history littered with major successes. The problem with that is that im well into middle age so how relevent is that history to somebody younger? My 25 year old son has no real idea of liverpools past and nor would a young top class player. Its fair to say, considering the belief that Liverpool ( and i don't disagree) is a "Big" club, their successes over the last 20 years have been poor, havent they? It would also be fair to say that our performance over that same period has been even worse BUT not hugely so.To this end, in order to sell ourselves to a big time Charlie, we have to sell ourselves in such a way that makes us more attractive to players than other clubs. We will have to sell them our history, which we do have, our ambition which we do have and, in all probability, a wage structure will have to be broken to demonstrate our ambition to them. Liverpool will actually have to do the same! A Young Brazilian/European will not understand to the same degree as a british player, just how significant Liverpool is on the world stage. The simple fact is, both clubs will have their work cut out attracting top quality players. It certainly helps matters, in terms of who is actualy in charge too. I would guess that Dalgleish will be more of a draw than redknapp because he has been successful both on the pitch and as a manager. It was Henry Ford who said "History is bunk" and, to a degree he was right. History is only relevent if you remember it, take an interest in it or it has directly affected you or the life you live. There is a whole new generation of players out there who will see Liverpools history no differently to the history of, say the great Ajax team of the 70s. ive found myself having to show my kids clips of Cryuff and Maradona just to give them an insite into a history that i remember and to demonstrate to them that Messi isn't the first "great" and won't be the last.
To close, how do we sell ourselves to top draw players? With lots of hard work and lots of money. I would, respectfully suggest that, in the year 2011, Liverpool will have to go down that route too, the world of football has changed, there are different clubs sitting at the top of the pile and liverpool will have to work damn hard to claw its way back to the top of the table. the difference between you and us is that we last sat at that table in the 60s and yourselves far more recently. You have a large hill to climb, we have a mountain. Remember tho, Everest was conquered, nothing is impossible so long as you have the belief, desire, ambition and funding to get you to the top. Dont believe that Liverpool are that much closer to the peak than we are, you are not. both clubs have work to do but both CAN push on. For us, it will depend on who we can keep not who we bring in, for liverpool, its going to be down to money, how much will the new owners chance their arms with by throwing it in? Personally, id give King kenny what he needs, i rate him highly, he will make the difference for you big time. Harry? Im not convinced tbh, less so now than ever. Time will tell.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

Excellent post whoever you are

Agree1 Disagree0

13 Jun 2011 08:07:11
Okay. Where do I start?
Right. Firstly, I don't purport to be eloquent and insightful and some bright spark.
Two, although I ended up insulting/mocking you lot, that wasn't the aim.

Winding you up or creating aggro was certainly last of my intentions.
Being a passionate footy fan, I guess I got carried away and couldn't resist having a pop at you.
Apologies.

We are all football fans, aren't we? And debate is part and parcel of the game.
When I asked you what your unique selling proposition was, I was being sincere.

I often hear you lot talk about Aguero, Hulk, Rossi, very good players indeed who'll have top, top clubs to pick from.
So I just wanted to find out from you what is it that you have which would make them choose you over those clubs.

Really, fellas, it's a genuine question. Forget what was said between us in previous posts and let's start on a clean slate.
I would really, really want to know what advantage you believe your club has over, let's say us and Arsenal.

There's a bloke who did say that what will you a chance at getting the cream of the crop is if the top and/or more prestigious clubs don't go after them.
Although that's not cast-iron a point, fair enough to the lad.

But I'm sure that's not the only card you think might swing it in your favour.
So come on, I wanna hear it.
No insults, no pops.
Just a civilised discussion between fans who are very passionate about clubs and expect great things for the future.

Let's get on with it.

Jack Masters

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Jack I think you hit it on the head there mate, whether or not anyone else believes we are capable of signing the 'top class' players or not WE DO. .

If we didn't have hopes or expectations to what we COULD achieve or who we COULD sign what would be the point in supporting anyone.

The rumour season is full swing and whether you choose to believe what the papers say is up to you, but i'm sure every forum on this webpage has all of the same on it - Who we would like our team to buy. .

We just have to wait and see where the players everybody wants end up at the beginning of the season.!

Kalrez

Agree2 Disagree0

I think you hit it on the head there mate, whether or not anyone else believes we are capable of signing the 'top class' players or not WE DO. .

u see that's the problem . . .

u will always believe it. . but does that changes the fact

u say u do . .ok lets assume u do. then y the hell u havent sign ant top players . .in last 2 years (dont name vdv again u also know how it happened u were his last option). last 2 the best of ur years . .n u couldnt make . .any any player to join u. . . .n that's the reality. .

u were in for. . .

fabiano - rejected
rossi- rejected
lorrente-rejected
forlan-rejected
now
henandez-rejected
girvano(lili)-rejected. . .even cole rejected u when he left chelsea hoping for big. .(though u can happily enjoy his wedges now. lol)

Agree1 Disagree1

Dude before you coming insulting atleast learn to spell players names and clubs.
Also atleast we don't get ripped of in every deal e.g. Carrol £35 million and Henderson £20 million what a waste

Agree1 Disagree0

I knew . . so does every one . .

i asked a simple Q. . if spuds r big then why no big signings . .

n just showed some facts abt spuds going for big guns n getting rejected.

but hell. . every one who read my Q irrespective of some wrong spells. . would know . .

spuds will have no ans. . so there will be an irritating.insulting. .personal comment. . .far far away from the football. as always

n u proved every one right.

Agree1 Disagree0

Yeah they may not have been top players when we signed them but they are now. Any team worth it's weight recognises how good Modric is, or they wouldn't be trying to buy him oh and again with Bale and Sandro.

And VDV, was we really his last option or just something people say to make them feel better about themselves for not signing him. (If you can provide documented evidence to back up your statement then i'll apologise but if not 'jog on' back to your own site)

Kalrez

Agree0 Disagree0

What the hell is with all the stops in your post mate, you got a stutter or something

Agree0 Disagree1

No need mate . .

apology from u. . why the hell. .

1st of all u clear ur facts . . that's enough for me.

whole world knows . .hodgson the old slut rejected vdv.
n we do missed out on him for that old farts mistake . .but its past now.

n yes ur wright . u have got stars

monkey boy( over hyped avg player)
modric. . yup talented
n vdv. . . . . .(though all r rumored of leaving )





but the discussion is abt. .being that big enough . . to attract big talents n stars

it was abt an comment on ur banter of signing . .mata/rossi/lorentte/aguero. .etc

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Jun 2011 01:10:25
Azza, if i had to pick one it would be rossi. He is very clinical and that is what we need to finish off all those chances we create.
I would be happy to see falcao here too.
Ed, how come when i click on the reply to post bit it doesn't work proper? Is it not compatable to some phones?

Spurs guvnor {Ed003's Note - Should work}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

12 Jun 2011 23:23:52
I mean, look. If you were Aguero/Rossi/Hulk right now and had to choose between playing with:
Pepe Reina, Glen Johnson, Jamie Carragher, Steven Gerrard, Raul Meireles, Luis Suarez and Andy Carroll or Gomez, Gallas, Bale, Modric (uncertain), "VDV", Lennon and Crouch, who would you choose?

Jack Masters
Id choose not to answer you because you are pointless and so is the post. Whether my fellow Yids wish to is up to them.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Liverpool r finished have manager whos been out of football for8 years now buying useless english players for millions

Agree0 Disagree0