05 Jan 2018 08:51:42
Looks like the Barkley deal is off due to wage demands.

1.) 05 Jan 2018
05 Jan 2018 15:41:37
I reckon we dropped our interest in him a while ago, none of my contacts have even mentioned Barkley for ages. For what reasons I don't know but maybe we just looking at different positions. What we need is a wide, fast, attacking, creative player hence the Malcolm, Zaha, Martial posts.

2.) 05 Jan 2018
05 Jan 2018 16:15:26
I still think we need someone to rival Erikson when he's not on form Ellis. Agree with the winger.

3.) 05 Jan 2018
05 Jan 2018 18:39:15
If we had wanted him we would of got him.

{Ed025's Note - thats not actually true ellis..

4.) 05 Jan 2018
05 Jan 2018 18:48:16
Stupid decision to allow him to slip away for £15m.

{Ed025's Note - he would not get in your midfield anyway oracle..

5.) 06 Jan 2018
05 Jan 2018 19:11:02
Agree Ed but we're crying out for someone to pressure Erikson. and for 15m. a steal. Poch would have undoubtedly made him a better player too.

6.) 06 Jan 2018
05 Jan 2018 19:12:15
Whats the truth then ed?

{Ed025's Note - the truth is he seen chelsea as the better option and they were prepared to pay better wages, he also wants to win things and like it or not chelsea have more chance than spurs of giving him that mate..

7.) 06 Jan 2018
06 Jan 2018 09:07:42
'better wages' my point exactly. let's 'judge' his decision in a year. see if he does indeed become a bench warmer.

not bothered either way personally as I trust in Poch and Levy to do what's right for our club, but an English player for that fee is a no brainer, sell him on in 2 years and make a profit? unless his wage demands were extremely high and therefore upsetting the rest of the players? and we really do not 100% know what other irons are in the fire.

Chelsea seem to sign, go out on loan, sit on the bench and sell quite a lot of players though, which Ross undoubtedly must have taken into consideration.

we could have clearly matched Barkleys night club ambition.

8.) 06 Jan 2018
06 Jan 2018 17:58:38
The truth is spurs weren't interested in the end. Davinson Sanchez chose us over Chelsea as did Llorente.

9.) 07 Jan 2018
07 Jan 2018 20:35:41
Ellis dee why do supporters nowadays obsess over who players signed for we beat them to his signature who cares yes we signed willian I couldn't give a shute who he was thinking of signing for, very childish
We won the player na na na naa na it's not our money our choice or in our hands so get over it.

10.) 07 Jan 2018
07 Jan 2018 21:44:55
Im just glad we didn't sign Morata 😂 another Chelsea 'bargain' 😂.

11.) 08 Jan 2018
08 Jan 2018 08:20:25
I know what you mean Ellis I must admit I would of preferred lamela.

12.) 08 Jan 2018
08 Jan 2018 15:28:27
You would of had another 40 or 50 mil leftover if you had.

13.) 09 Jan 2018
09 Jan 2018 17:24:10
I was being sarcastic.

14.) 09 Jan 2018
09 Jan 2018 19:47:54
Well I never 😮.